Customizing Summon for a Specific User Population: A Health Sciences Library’s Experience

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5195/palrap.2022.266

Abstract

The Harrell Health Sciences Library: Research and Learning Commons (HHSL) tailored their discovery solution, Ex Libris Summon, to better meet the needs of its health sciences users. The customizations encourage more sophisticated searching behaviors and improves usability of the library website for browsing and finding known items. HHSL worked with Penn State University Libraries and their Ex Libris Customer Success Manager to create customized search panels as well as turn on features available in Summon. While these customizations are specific to a health sciences library, any library can use these practices to customize their instance of Summon for their user group(s).

Author Biography

Marie Cirelli, Penn State College of Medicine, The Pennsylvania State University

Associate Librarian

Harrell Health Sciences Library: Research and Learning Commons

References

Foster, A. K. (2018). Determining librarian research preferences: A comparison survey of web-scale discovery systems and subject databases. The Journal of Academic Librarianship, 44(3), 330-336. doi.org/10.1016/j.acalib.2018.04.001

Hanneke, R., & O'Brien, K. K. (2016). Comparison of three web-scale discovery services for health sciences research. Journal of the Medical Library Association: JMLA, 104(2), 109-117. doi.org/10.5195/jmla.2016.52

Judd, T., & Kennedy, G. (2011). Expediency‐based practice? Medical students' reliance on Google and Wikipedia for biomedical inquiries. British Journal of Educational Technology, 42(2), 351-360. doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8535.2009.01019.x

Ketterman, E., & Inman, M. E. (2014). Discovery tool vs. PubMed: A health sciences literature comparison analysis. Journal of Electronic Resources in Medical Libraries, 11(3), 115-123. doi.org/10.1080/15424065.2014.938999

Long, B. A. (2017). Addressing a discovery tool's shortcomings with a supplemental health sciences-specific federated search engine. Journal of Electronic Resources in Medical Libraries, 14(3-4), 101-113. doi.org/10.1080/15424065.2017.1368425

Meirose, J., & Lian, B. (2019). User testing: Gathering data from first-year medical students as they interact with the EBSCO Discovery Service (EDS). Journal of Electronic Resources in Medical Libraries, 16(1), 1-7. doi.org/10.1080/15424065.2019.1590171

Miranda, A., & Miah, S. J. (2019). Design and evaluation of a contextual model for information retrieval from web-scale discovery services to improve evidence-based practice by health care practitioners: Mixed methods study. Journal of medical Internet research, 21(8), 1-18. doi.org/10.2196/12621

Pinkas, M. M., Baglivo, M. D., Klein, I. R., Brown, E., Harris, R., & Gerhart, B. (2014). Selecting and implementing a discovery tool: The University of Maryland Health Sciences and Human Services library experience. Journal of Electronic Resources in Medical Libraries, 11(1), 1-12. doi.org/10.1080/15424065.2013.876574

Shahid, S. (2019). Smart library services with discovery tool: A present-day context. Pakistan Library & Information Science Journal, 50(4), 52-57. ecommons.aku.edu/libraries/37/

Thompson, J. L., Sullo, E., Abate, L. E., Heselden, M., & Lyons, K. M. (2018). Discovery assessment and improvement at an academic health sciences library: Health information@ Himmelfarb five years later. Journal of Electronic Resources in Medical Libraries, 15(1), 7-25. doi.org/10.1080/15424065.2018.1433093

Downloads

Published

2022-06-21

Issue

Section

Practice