Affording Access: Pathways to Reducing Textbook Costs

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5195/palrap.2021.250

Abstract

After piloting an Open Educational Resources (OER) grant program, librarians from the University of Scranton’s Weinberg Memorial Library OER Committee conducted a survey of librarians about the inclusion of library resources in OER initiatives. The survey examined if institutions defined library resources as OER, why libraries chose not to include library resources, and, if included, the types of library-licensed or purchased content. The survey found that most (18 of 27) respondents did not include OER and library resources together and, of the institutions that did, a majority (5 of 9) used licensed library resources in addition to open educational and open access resources. The conclusion of this article looks at the pilot grant program and the OER Committee’s decision to realign and rebrand the grant in light of the survey results.

Author Biographies

Kelly Banyas, Weinberg Memorial Library The University of Scranton

Kelly Banyas is an Assistant Professor and the Research & Instruction Librarian for Student Success at The University of Scranton's Weinberg Memorial Library.

Marleen Cloutier, Weinberg Memorial Library The University of Scranton

Marleen Cloutier is an Assistant Professor and the Cataloging & Metadata Librarian for the University of Scranton’s Weinberg Memorial Library.

References

Allen, I. E., & Seaman, J. (2016, July). Opening the textbook: Educational resources in U.S. Higher Education, 2015-16. www.onlinelearningsurvey.com/reports/openingthetextbook2016.pdf

Aulisio, G. (2020). Prices of U.S. and foreign published materials. In J. Bryans (Ed.), Library and book trade almanac (pp. 331-386). Information Today.

Bell, S. J., & Salem, J. A. (2017). It’s up to the librarians: Establishing a statewide OER initiative. Pennsylvania Libraries: Research & Practice, 5(2), 77-82. doi.org/10.5195/palrap.2017.166

Biswas-Diener, R. (2017). You can’t sell free, and other OER problems. In: R.S. Jhangiani & R. Biswas-Diener (Eds.), Open: The philosophy and practices that are revolutionizing education and science. (pp. 257–265). Ubiquity Press. doi.org/10.5334/bbc.u

Boczar J., & Pascual, L. (2017). E-books for the classroom and open access textbooks: Two ways to help students save money on textbooks, The Serials Librarian, 72(1-4), 95-101. https://doi.org/10.1080/0361526X.2017.1309830

Braddlee, & VanScoy, A. (2019). Bridging the chasm: Faculty support roles for academic librarians in the adoption of Open Educational Resources. College & Research Libraries, 80(4), 426–449. doi.org/10.5860/crl.80.4.426

Borchard, L., & Magnuson, L. (2017). Library leadership in open educational resource adoption and affordable learning initiatives. Urban Library Journal, 23(1), 1-13. academicworks.cuny.edu/ulj/vol23/iss1/1

Buczynski, J. A. (2007). Faculty begin to replace textbooks with “freely” accessible online resources. Internet Reference Services Quarterly, 11(4), 169-179. doi.org/10.1300/J136v11n04_11

Christensson, P. (2006). DRM definition. Retrieved February 13, 2021, from techterms.com

Colvard, N. B., Watson, C. E., & Park, H. (2018). The impact of Open Educational Resources on various student success metrics. International Journal of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education, 30(2), 262–276. www.isetl.org/ijtlhe/pdf/IJTLHE3386.pdf

Cooney, C. (2017). What impacts do OER have on students? Students share their experiences with a health psychology OER at New York City College of Technology. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 18(4), 155-178. doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v18i4.3111

Croteau, E. (2017). Measures of student success with textbook transformations: The Affordable Learning Georgia Initiative. Open Praxis, 9(1), 93–108. doi.org/10.5944/openpraxis.9.1.505

Crozier, H. (2018). Promoting open access and open educational resources to faculty. The Serials Librarian, 74(1-4), 145-150. doi.org/10.1080/0361526X.2018.1428470

Florida Virtual Campus. (2019, March 8). 2019 Florida student textbook & course materials survey. https://dlss.flvc.org/documents/210036/1314923/2018+Student+Textbook+and+Course+Materials+Survey+Report+--+FINAL+VERSION+--+20190308.pdf/07478d85-89c2-3742-209a-9cc5df8cd7ea

Hilton, J. (2016). Open educational resources and college textbook choices: A review of research on efficacy and perceptions. Educational Technology Research and Development, 64(4), 573–590. doi.org/10.1007/s11423-016-9434-9

Hilton, J. (2020). Open educational resources, student efficacy, and user perceptions: A synthesis of research published between 2015 and 2018. Educational Technology Research and Development, 68(3), 853–876. doi.org/10.1007/s11423-019-09700-4

Jhangiani, R. S., & Jhangiani, S. (2017). Investigating the perceptions, use, and impact of open textbooks: A survey of post-secondary students in British Columbia. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 18(4), 172-192. doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v18i4.3012

Ma, J., Baum, S., Pender, M., & Libassi, CJ (2019). Trends in college pricing 2019. College Board. research.collegeboard.org/pdf/trends-college-pricing-2019-full-report.pdf

Nagle, C., & Vitez, K. (2020, June 8). Fixing the broken textbook market. Student PIRGs. studentpirgs.org/2020/06/08/fixing-the-broken-textbook-market/

National Center for Education Statistics. (2019). Chapter 3: Postsecondary education. Digest of education statistics, 2018 (NCES 2020-009). nces.ed.gov/programs/digest/d18/ch_3.asp

Open Education Group. (n.d.). The Review Project. Retrieved February 13, 2021, from openedgroup.org/review

Richard, B., Cleavenger, D., & Storey, V.A. (2014). The buy-in: A qualitative investigation of the textbook purchase decision. Journal of Higher Education Theory and Practice, 14(3), 20-31.

Salem, J.A. (2017). Open pathways to student success: Academic library partnerships for open educational resource and affordable course content creation and adoption. The Journal of Academic Librarianship, 43(1), 34-38. doi.org/10.1016/j.acalib.2016.10.003

Seaman, J. E., & Seaman, J. (2021). Digital Texts in the Time of COVID. www.bayviewanalytics.com/reports/digitaltextsinthetimeofcovid.pdf

Sobotka, C., Wheeler, H., & White, H. (2019). Leveraging cataloging and collection development expertise to improve OER discovery. OLA Quarterly, 25(1), 17–24. doi.org/10.7710/1093-7374.1971

SPARC. (n.d). Open education. Retrieved February 13, 2021, from sparcopen.org/open-education/

Spilovoy, T., Seaman, J., & Ralph, N. (2020). The Impact of OER Initiatives on Faculty Selection of Classroom Materials. www.bayviewanalytics.com/reports/impactofoerinitiatives.pdf

Thomas, C. (2018, October 8). OER and accessibility: Working toward inclusive learning. sparcopen.org/news/2018/oer-accessibility-working-toward-inclusive-learning/

Thomas, W.J., & Bernhardt, B.R. (2018). Helping keep the costs of textbooks for students down: Two approaches. Technical Services Quarterly, 35(3), 257-268. doi.org/10.1080/07317131.2018.1456844

Todorinova, L., & Wilkinson, Z. T. (2019). Closing the loop: Students, academic libraries, and textbook affordability. The Journal of Academic Librarianship, 45(3), 268–277. doi.org/10.1016/j.acalib.2019.03.010

Wakefield Research. (2018, May). VitalSource survey: QuickRead report. get.vitalsource.com/hubfs/2018%20Wakefield/Wakefield%20Research%20QuickRead%20Report%20for%20VitalSource.pdf

Wiley, D. (n.d.). Defining the "open" in open content and open educational resources. Retrieved February 13, 2021, from opencontent.org/definition/

UNESCO (n.d.). Open Educational Resources (OER). Retrieved February 13, 2021, from en.unesco.org/themes/building-knowledge-societies/oer

United States Government Accounting Office. (2013). College textbooks: Students have greater access to textbook information (GAO-13-368). US Government Accounting Office. gao.gov/assets/660/655066.pdf

Downloads

Published

2021-06-29

Issue

Vol. 9 No. 1 (2021)

Section

Research

License

Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:

  1. The Author retains copyright in the Work, where the term “Work” shall include all digital objects that may result in subsequent electronic publication or distribution.
  2. Upon acceptance of the Work, the author shall grant to the Publisher the right of first publication of the Work.
  3. The Author shall grant to the Publisher and its agents the nonexclusive perpetual right and license to publish, archive, and make accessible the Work in whole or in part in all forms of media now or hereafter known under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License or its equivalent, which, for the avoidance of doubt, allows others to copy, distribute, and transmit the Work under the following conditions:
    1. Attribution—other users must attribute the Work in the manner specified by the author as indicated on the journal Web site;
    with the understanding that the above condition can be waived with permission from the Author and that where the Work or any of its elements is in the public domain under applicable law, that status is in no way affected by the license.
  4. The Author is able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the nonexclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the Work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), as long as there is provided in the document an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
  5. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post online a prepublication manuscript (but not the Publisher’s final formatted PDF version of the Work) in institutional repositories or on their Websites prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work. Any such posting made before acceptance and publication of the Work shall be updated upon publication to include a reference to the Publisher-assigned DOI (Digital Object Identifier) and a link to the online abstract for the final published Work in the Journal.
  6. Upon Publisher’s request, the Author agrees to furnish promptly to Publisher, at the Author’s own expense, written evidence of the permissions, licenses, and consents for use of third-party material included within the Work, except as determined by Publisher to be covered by the principles of Fair Use.
  7. The Author represents and warrants that:
    1. the Work is the Author’s original work;
    2. the Author has not transferred, and will not transfer, exclusive rights in the Work to any third party;
    3. the Work is not pending review or under consideration by another publisher;
    4. the Work has not previously been published;
    5. the Work contains no misrepresentation or infringement of the Work or property of other authors or third parties; and
    6. the Work contains no libel, invasion of privacy, or other unlawful matter.
  8. The Author agrees to indemnify and hold Publisher harmless from Author’s breach of the representations and warranties contained in Paragraph 6 above, as well as any claim or proceeding relating to Publisher’s use and publication of any content contained in the Work, including third-party content.

Revised 7/21/2020. Revision Description: Updated to APA 7th style.