Playing as Argument Architects: Bridging a Learning Gap in the Research Process

Elizabeth Nelson, Brett Spencer

Abstract


This article reports on the design process and initial results of a project to create a board game, Argument Architect, that bridges the gap between librarians’ and students’ understanding of research and rhetoric. Some students perceive research as a step-by-step, linear process; in contrast, however, most librarians view it as an iterative, dynamic activity. In order to use Argument Architect as a springboard to a classroom conversation, we designed it to avoid the competitive/destructive nature of most board games in favor of a cooperative/constructive schema that fostered a flowing, playful, and reflective dialog between students and librarians about the “messy” nature of research. We also kept in mind our practical needs, as instruction librarians, for a game with flexibility, scalability, portability, and intuitive play that we could efficiently deploy multiple times in composition classes with different class lengths and assignments. We share details and images of the game in multiple stages of development, student and instructor reactions, and future plans.


Full Text:

PDF

References


Alsawaier, Raed S. (2018). "The effect of gamification on motivation and engagement." The International Journal of Information and Learning Technology 35(1), 56-79.

American Library Association. (2019). Gamification. Library of the Future, Center for the Future of Libraries. Retrieved from http://www.ala.org/tools/future/trends/gamification

Association of College and Research Libraries. (2016). Framework for information literacy in higher education. Retrieved from http://www.ala.org/acrl/standards/ilframework

Chisholm, A., & AUTHOR (2019).

Deterding, S., Dixon, D., Khaled, R., & Nacke, L. (2011). From game design elements to gamefulness: Defining "gamification". Proceedings of the 15th International Academic MindTrek Conference: Envisioning Future Media Environments, 9-15. doi:10.1145/2181037.2181040

Kim, S., Burton, J. K., Kibong, S., & Lockee, B. B. (2018). Gamification in learning and education: Enjoy learning like gaming. Switzerland, Springer.

Margino, M. (2013). Revitalizing traditional information literacy instruction: Exploring games in academic libraries. Public Services Quarterly, 9(4), 333-341.

McMunn-Tetangco, E. (2017). Gamification: A practical guide for librarians (Vol. 31). Rowman & Littlefield.

Penn State Program in Writing and Rhetoric. (2020). Courses. Retrieved from https://www.pwr.psu.edu/courses/

Rusch, D. C. (2017). Making deep games: Designing games with meaning and purpose. Focal Press.

Tekulve, N., Cowden, C., & Myers, J. (2015). The Game of Research: [Board] Gamification of library instruction. The Journal of Creative Library Practice, 23. Retrieved from http://creativelibrarypractice.org/2015/09/23/the-game-of-research/




DOI: https://doi.org/10.5195/palrap.2020.219



Copyright (c) 2020 Elizabeth Nelson

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.